The latest
version of SVFlux implements stochastic analysis of model input parameters.
SVFlux accomplishes this by allowing multiple runs of the same problem
while varying such soil properties as saturated hydraulic conductivity,
the air entry value, the slope of the soil-water characteristic curve,
or the slope of the unsaturated portion of the hydraulic conductivity
curve, among other parameters. The statistical variation
of input parameters allows for accommodation of the natural variability
in soil properties may be a result of the natural spatial variation
of field soil properties. The resultant change of pore-water pressure,
heads, or flow rates may then be observed.
Why
do we need stochastic analysis?
The natural world is highly variable. Variability in soil properties may be
a result of the natural spatial variation of field soil properties. For example,
the variation of saturated hydraulic conductivity is often significant. Variability
can also be introduced at the laboratory level. Laboratory testing of the soil-water
characteristic curve can result in differences in results depending on the
laboratory involved, simple preparation, and the technician performing the
test (Zapata, 2000).
Accounting
for this variation in finite element models has historically been difficult.
Modelers often try to present results representative of a “best
guess” or averaged soil properties. Perhaps a “best-case-worst-case” scenario
is presented. While both approaches are valid, they lack the mathematical
soundness of applying statistical principles to account for model input
parameter variability. SVFlux allows the modeling to apply
statistical principles to account for potential variation in soil properties.
The result is a more comprehensive picture of model performance than
previously possible.
What
soil properties can be varied?
The specific soil properties that may be varied are shown in Table 1. Any of
the variational methods implemented may be applied to these parameters and
the resultant changes in pore water pressures, head valves, or flow rates can
be plotted.
Variable
Description
ksat
Saturated
Hydraulic Conductivity
Mcampbell p
Modified Campbell p
Leong p
Leong and Rahardjo p
af
Fredlund and Xing a
nf
van Genuchten a
avg
van Genuchten a
nvg
van Genuchten n
am
van Genuchten and Mualem a
nm
van Genuchten and Mualem n
ag
Gardner a
ng
Gardner n
What
Stochastic Methods are Implemented?
SVFlux implements the following types of stochastic methods in both 2D
and 3D.
Stochastic
Methods
3 point normal
5 point normal
Monte Carlo normal
Monte Carlo lognormal
Linear
Triangular
Exponential
Poissons
Each method
may be applied to any particular soil property. The user can select
the method implemented as well as (for most methods) the number of
values (and resultant runs) to generate. Variational methods may also
be applied to a single soil property or multiple soil properties at
once.
So
how might this work?
An example of how the stochastic features may work is as follows. A particular
engineer has a fairly well defined problem to solve. Geometry and bonding conditions
are well-defined. A tempe cell test has been run and a soil-water characteristic
cue has been established. A series of falling-head tests were run to establish
the saturated hydraulic conductivity.
The
falling head test, however, yielded a group of differing measurements.
To account for this variability the modeler would typically average
the conductivity values and run the model once with the averaged values.
With the new features available in SVFlux, the user may now run the
model in the following ways:
The
first way may be to input all conductivities into the model. The model
would then be run multiple times; one time for each input value.
The
problem with the first method is that each measurement is weighted
equally. A better approach may be to use the Monte Carlo lognormal
distribution. With the Monte Carlo method, the user inputs the mean
and standard deviation of the laboratory conductivities. SVFlux will
then generate a preset number (i.e., 25) random conductivity values
that represent the same lognormal distribution. The finite element
model is then run 25 times and the variation in heads on flow rates
may be plotted.